Judicial review – protective court proceedings to secure Employment Tribunal claimsBack to News Listing
Anela Anwar v Advocate General and ECHR  CSIH 43
The Inner House refused a reclaiming motion in which it was held that an applicant in employment Tribunal proceedings could competently raise protective proceedings in the courts to obtain diligence. Lord Drummond Young held (1) that protective proceedings could be raised in the courts for diligence notwithstanding that the courts have no jurisdiction to hear the merits of the dispute, (2) the purpose of such an action is to obtain diligence as interim security as the other litigation proceeds (3) the basis for the action is the proceedings in another forum (4) Part1A of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 addressed the requirements of diligence but did not affect the substance of parties rights, (5) the existing law of diligence and the requirement to raise ancillary proceedings for interim security was not “excessively difficult” and there was no breach of the EU law effectiveness principle, and (6) there was no breach of the equivalence principle and the appropriate comparator was another employment-related claim. The Lord President issued a dissenting opinion.
Ruth Crawford QC appeared for the Advocate General.
David Whitehouse and Paul Clark v The Chief Constable and The Lord Advocate  CSIH 52
Axiom the “go-to” stable, “boasting an unrivalled bench of experienced commercial advocates”
Home to ‘the strongest collection of expertise at the Scottish Bar in relation to public law”’
Joanna Cherry and others v the Advocate General for Scotland - Key involvement from numerous Axiom members in landmark constitutional case