Interpretation of provisions in commercial leasesBack to News Listing
Lord Doherty’s Opinion has been issued today in the case of Tonsley (Strathclyde) Limited and another v Scottish Enterprise. The case is the latest in a developing body of caselaw concerning the proper interpretation of provisions in commercial leases dealing with the remedies available to a landlord regarding the enforcement of terminal dilapidations obligations. Lord Doherty followed the approach of the Inner House in @SIPP Pension Trustees v Insight Travel Services 2016 SLT 131 and, in so doing, expressed the view that it was not open to him to follow his own previous Opinion in Mapeley Acquisition Co (3) Ltd (in receivership) v City of Edinburgh Council  CSOH 29.
David Thomson and Jonathan Barne, both of Axiom, appeared respectively for the Pursuer and the Defender.
A copy of Lord Doherty’s Opinion is available here (http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=c0be1fa7-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7).
Transform Schools (North Lanarkshire) Limited v Balfour Beatty Construction Limited & Anr  CSOH 19
David Whitehouse and Paul Clark v The Chief Constable and The Lord Advocate  CSIH 52
Axiom the “go-to” stable, “boasting an unrivalled bench of experienced commercial advocates”
Home to ‘the strongest collection of expertise at the Scottish Bar in relation to public law”’
Joanna Cherry and others v the Advocate General for Scotland - Key involvement from numerous Axiom members in landmark constitutional case