Inner House rules on implied servitude disputeBack to News Listing
The Inner House has issued its opinion (http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=726e1ca7-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7) in the case of ASA International Limited v Kashmiri Properties. The case concerned a dispute between the proprietors of two adjoining townhouses in the New Town of Edinburgh as to whether the Pursuer’s property had the benefit of an implied servitude of access over the Defender’s property. The two properties had, at one time, been in common ownership. The Opinion of the Court (delivered by Lord Drummond Young) contains an interesting discussion not just of the applicable legal principles to this unusual form of servitude but also a wider, and illuminating, consideration of the broader policy considerations which arise in this area of the law.
David Thomson of Axiom Advocates appeared for the successful Defender and Respondent.
Transform Schools (North Lanarkshire) Limited v Balfour Beatty Construction Limited & Anr  CSOH 19
David Whitehouse and Paul Clark v The Chief Constable and The Lord Advocate  CSIH 52
Axiom the “go-to” stable, “boasting an unrivalled bench of experienced commercial advocates”
Home to ‘the strongest collection of expertise at the Scottish Bar in relation to public law”’
Joanna Cherry and others v the Advocate General for Scotland - Key involvement from numerous Axiom members in landmark constitutional case