Atholl Developments (Slackbuie) Limited -v- UBC Group Limited  CSOH 94.Back to News Listing
Atholl, a property developer, and UBC, a contractor were in dispute about the true value of UBC's final account. Atholl referred the dispute to adjudication. The adjudicator decided that the correct value was at a level between those respectively contended for by the parties.
In a seco nd adjudication UBC sought payment of the balance due in terms of the first adjudication. The adjudicator made an award accordingly. UBC sought summary decree to enforce the award. Atholl sought judicial review to reduce the award, arguing that, in adjudication 1, the adjudicator had made a series of such serious errors as to demonstrate a failure on his part to properly consider Atholl's arguments.
Lord Glennie refused to reduce the decisions and granted summary decree in favour of UBC. He restated the principle that an adjudicator's decision will not to be reduced on account of errors of fact or law. He also decided that, as no attack had been made to adjudication 1 before adjudication 2 had commenced, the adjudicator had no choice but to follow adjudication 1, as he had done. This latter point is very significant. It is common these days for parties to construction contracts to engage in a series of adjudications, each dependent to some extent on the earlier decisions. It appears that a failure to challenge an earlier decision on grounds of jurisdiction or natural justice will result in the ability to do so later, once a further decision has been reached, being lost. Parties may have to an challenge adjudicator's decision very quickly, if they want to do so at all.
Gavin Walker of Axiom Advocates was junior counsel for UBC.
Transform Schools (North Lanarkshire) Limited v Balfour Beatty Construction Limited & Anr  CSOH 19
David Whitehouse and Paul Clark v The Chief Constable and The Lord Advocate  CSIH 52
Axiom the “go-to” stable, “boasting an unrivalled bench of experienced commercial advocates”
Home to ‘the strongest collection of expertise at the Scottish Bar in relation to public law”’
Joanna Cherry and others v the Advocate General for Scotland - Key involvement from numerous Axiom members in landmark constitutional case