Axiom Advocates

Latest News

  • 14 May 2012

    Places available: Third Thursday lecture - EU Law - 17 May 2012
  • 10 May 2012

    Paul John Clark and David John Whitehouse, joint administrators of Rangers Football Club Plc [2012] CSOH 55
  • 9 May 2012

    Healthcare at Home Limited v The Common Services Agency [2012] CSOH 75
  • 17 April 2012

    Appeals from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Session – “second appeal test” ultra vires
  • 26 March 2012

    Supreme Court rules on the sequential approach
  • 21 March 2012

    Axiom member appointed new Scotland Editor for the European Law Reports
Find an advocate
  • James McNeill QC
  • Heriot Currie QC
  • Lord (Neil) Davidson of Glen Clova
  • Richard Keen QC
  • Gerry Moynihan QC
  • Iain Ferguson QC
  • David Johnston QC
  • James Wolffe QC
  • Alistair Clark QC
  • Ruth Crawford QC
  • Sarah Wolffe QC
  • Jonathan Lake QC
  • James Mure QC
  • Roddy Dunlop QC
  • Mark Lindsay QC
  • Anna Poole
  • Sean Smith
  • Alastair Duncan
  • Kenny McBrearty
  • Garry Borland
  • Roisin Higgins
  • Gavin Walker
  • Morag Ross
  • Jonathan Barne
  • Almira Delibegović-Broome
  • Martin Richardson
  • Paul O'Brien
  • Christopher Wilson
  • Euan Duthie
  • John N M MacGregor
  • Miranda Hamilton
  • Alasdair McKenzie
  • Helen Watts
  • Susan Ower
  • Chris Paterson
  • Ross McClelland

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

  • Home
  • About us
  • Advocates
  • Practice areas
  • News
  • Seminars
  • Contact us

Hallam Land Management Ltd-v-The Scottish Ministers

31 March 2009

This case relates to a statutory appeal against the refusal by East Dunbartonshire Council to grant a positive certificate of appropriate alternative development  ("CAAD") for a site which Hallam had acquired in the 1970s.  The Council certified in 2002 that the only acceptable use of the land would be amenity space for informal recreation and nature conservation interests ( a "negative certificate").  Hallam had wanted to build houses there but a series of refusals of planning consents effectively sterilised the land.  Hallam used the planning legislation to force the Council to purchase the land, which they did.  In order to enhance the price they would be paid for the land Hallam sought a CAAD.  Hallam appealed the negative CAAD to the Scottish Ministers who appointed a Reporter to hold an inquiry, usually referred to as a shadow inquiry because the residential development under discussion will never take place.  The Reporter recommended a limited development on the northern part of the site only.  The Scottish Ministers went further and restored the Council's negative certificate.  That decision was appealed to the Court of Session successfully in 2004.  The Scottish Ministers then issued another decision letter in similar terms.  Hallam again appealed. 

The Lord Ordinary (Brailsford) refused the appeal.  The Inner House allowed the appeal and quashed the Scottish Ministers' decision essentially on the ground that they failed to treat as cancelled the notional proposal underlying the deemed use of compulsory powers (open space for informal recreation).  The case is of interest for its discussion of the relationship between the purchase notice provisions under the Planning Acts and the compulsory purchase regime particularly section 25 of the Land Compensation (Scotland) Act 1963.

J. Gordon Reid Q.C. and Ruth Crawford Q.C. both of Axiom Advocates appeared for Hallam and the Scottish Ministers respectively.
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2009CSIH22.html


[ Back to news page ]
  • You are here
  • News
  • Hallam Land Management Ltd-v-The Scottish Ministers

Axiom Advocates Advocates Library Parliament House Edinburgh EH1 1R
Tel: 0131 226 2881 Fax: 0131 225 3642 | Registered No.48261 Scotland.

  • Site Map
  • Links
  • Accessibility
  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy

2009 Axiom Advocates. Faculty Services Ltd. | site by Sears Davies