Axiom Advocates

Latest News

  • 14 May 2012

    Places available: Third Thursday lecture - EU Law - 17 May 2012
  • 10 May 2012

    Paul John Clark and David John Whitehouse, joint administrators of Rangers Football Club Plc [2012] CSOH 55
  • 9 May 2012

    Healthcare at Home Limited v The Common Services Agency [2012] CSOH 75
  • 17 April 2012

    Appeals from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Session – “second appeal test” ultra vires
  • 26 March 2012

    Supreme Court rules on the sequential approach
  • 21 March 2012

    Axiom member appointed new Scotland Editor for the European Law Reports
Find an advocate
  • James McNeill QC
  • Heriot Currie QC
  • Lord (Neil) Davidson of Glen Clova
  • Richard Keen QC
  • Gerry Moynihan QC
  • Iain Ferguson QC
  • David Johnston QC
  • James Wolffe QC
  • Alistair Clark QC
  • Ruth Crawford QC
  • Sarah Wolffe QC
  • Jonathan Lake QC
  • James Mure QC
  • Roddy Dunlop QC
  • Mark Lindsay QC
  • Anna Poole
  • Sean Smith
  • Alastair Duncan
  • Kenny McBrearty
  • Garry Borland
  • Roisin Higgins
  • Gavin Walker
  • Morag Ross
  • Jonathan Barne
  • Almira Delibegović-Broome
  • Martin Richardson
  • Paul O'Brien
  • Christopher Wilson
  • Euan Duthie
  • John N M MacGregor
  • Miranda Hamilton
  • Alasdair McKenzie
  • Helen Watts
  • Susan Ower
  • Chris Paterson
  • Ross McClelland

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

Axiom Advocates News

Our latest news stories are listed above. For older stories, please check the Archive.

  • Home
  • About us
  • Advocates
  • Practice areas
  • News
  • Seminars
  • Contact us

Legal tests to be applied by Mental Health Tribunals

12 February 2009

If an offender suffers from a mental disorder, in addition to a compulsion order authorising detention in a mental hospital, a restriction order may be imposed by the sentencing court.  The purpose of restriction orders is to provide additional safeguards in the decision making process concerned with the management and possible release of a restricted patient, in the public interest.  Mental Health Tribunals were given a new power by the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 to revoke restriction orders in circumstances specified in Section 193. 

Scottish Ministers v Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland and JK [2009] CSIH 9 is an important decision of the Inner House on the statutory tests to be applied by Mental Health Tribunals when reviewing cases concerning patients subject to restriction orders.  The Mental Health Tribunal had revoked the restriction order to which the patient was subject.  Its decision was overturned by the Inner House on appeal by the Scottish Ministers.  The Inner House took the opportunity to set out the approach which should be taken by all Mental Health Tribunals to Section 193 of the 2003 Act, in particular in relation to the sequential nature of the statutory provisions, the serious harm test, and the continued necessity of a restriction order. 

The successful Scottish Ministers were represented by David Johnston QC and Anna Poole of Axiom Advocates.

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2009CSIH9.html


[ Back to news page ]
  • You are here
  • News
  • Legal tests to be applied by Mental Health Tribunals

Axiom Advocates Advocates Library Parliament House Edinburgh EH1 1R
Tel: 0131 226 2881 Fax: 0131 225 3642 | Registered No.48261 Scotland.

  • Site Map
  • Links
  • Accessibility
  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy

2009 Axiom Advocates. Faculty Services Ltd. | site by Sears Davies